Par : John Lofranco
« La science fait peur. » Pas du tout. C’est un fait que les « découvertes » en science de sport servent a confirmer ce que les entraineurs ont su pendant des années. Ceci n’est pas pour dire qu’il ne...
View ArticlePar : Blaise Dubois
Commentaire de Daniel Riou : https://courseapied.ca/2015/05/20/retour-sur-le-grand-debat-sur-la-technique-de-course/
View ArticlePar : Blaise Dubois
Merci John pour ton commentaire, Je tiens à préciser que ma citation « la science fait peur » ne te ciblait pas spécifiquement. Pour le débat sur la cadence, voici quelques faits qui sont tous...
View ArticlePar : Alex Hutchinson
Salut les gars, Good discussion, and great to see that you’re having public events bringing these questions to a wider audience. Re. 180 cadence, to me it depends on how literally you expect people to...
View ArticlePar : Blaise Dubois
Alex, Agree with pretty everything! Just one precision : the U-shaped curve on inefficiency is not symmetrical… going too high is less inefficient than going too low. Also rarely people are choosing...
View ArticlePar : Alex Hutchinson
That’s an interesting point that the U-curve isn’t symmetric — I didn’t realize that. I certainly agree that more people err on the side of lower cadence than higher cadence!
View ArticlePar : John Lofranco
Blaise, I think you are being disingenuous with this. You are backpedalling from your original stance which was 180 +/- 10 for beginners without much subtlety. You use science like a bludgeon, rather...
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....